Reasoning
We received subagent message from editor after we already responded to user. User didn't ask new question, but provided subagent_message. Need acknowledge maybe say收到，这版 editor R2 比我的摘要更完整，后续以该版为准. Maybe mention can merge into working standard. No need tool? Could update todo? Not necessary but maybe read? Since no action requested. Respond concise.
Content
收到，这版 `editor` 的 R2 增量格式规范更完整，后续应以这版为准。
我会把它作为后续周报的永久执行口径，关键点包括：
- R2 不重写 R1，冲突时 R2 优先
- 本周起严格执行日期窗口
- 被查 / 被罚 / 人事任免设为强制检索项
- 首页新增“核心摘要”
- 首页强制加入 AI 生成脚注
- 剔除上市金融机构股票走势
- 总页数控制在 30 页以内
- hunter 输入字段按 12 项最低字段执行
后续如果你要我继续生成本周正式报告，我会直接按这版 R2 规范组织内容。